Cognitive computing · decision-making in humans and machines
rdji@uw.edu · CV · GitHub · LinkedIn · Twitter
I study how humans and machines move from uncertain information to a committed decision. When does a system know it has enough evidence to commit? What makes that commitment reliable? I build controlled environments to measure it, and I care about the semantic structure and memory that sit between evidence and a decision.
Previously I built and shipped data-driven products end to end as a technical founder. I am now moving into research in computational cognition.
A controlled environment for studying decision-making under uncertainty. A grid of words
hides several secret groups; humans and AI agents play the exact same boards, so every
match becomes a process-level comparison of how a mind moves from ambiguous information to
a committed answer.
Difficulty is manipulated along two independent axes; combinatorial (board size) and semantic (structure, margin, distractors). Boards are machine-generated to reduce overlap with any model's training data. Currently working to enhance this tool through constraining them similarly. Performance might differ but process could be similar.
This comes to question: How can we evaluate the similarity of the process of answering this task by LLM systems and humans in a species-fair way?
Gentags: Discrete Semantic State for Constraint-Sensitive Decision Pipelines 2025 – 2026
First-author preprint introducing Gentags, a representation that compresses source text into short, evidence-grounded semantic units used as inspectable intermediate state in LLM decision pipelines. In a controlled study isolating representation structure, Gentags raised agreement with full-evidence decisions to 79.5% (vs. 52.3–61.6% for RAKE/YAKE/TF-IDF) and hard-constraint satisfaction to 97.3% (vs. 84.7–89.3%). [PDF]
Dynamic Information 2024
An LLM agent that builds and self-updates a knowledge/decision graph with an explicit hypothesis structure for Bayesian-style reasoning. Its limits motivated the shift to studying commitment under uncertainty directly.
Recommendation System & Smart Filters — UW MSIM Capstone (sponsor & lead) 2025 – 2026
Directed two capstone teams applying the Gentags approach to a live product, shipping a recommendation system and categorical/nudging filters now in production.
A shelf around cognition, computation, and decision-making. Drag the shelf; the laptop on the right holds the papers. Read and the next on the line.
Papers — pick one to open it on the laptop